|
Question: Has anyone
(particularly the guardians of our community's safety) looked into the background of
the dairy cows which are going to be brought to Foster County?
Notice that they are coming from Calmar, Alberta, Canada. See
the links below their application, and find out more about that
region and its connection to "mad cow disease."
COMMENT: Coincidentally, it
just so happens that the
proposed MEGA-dairy which wants to locate near Carrington would be owned by Corne and Conny Van Bedaf
from Calmar, Alberta, Canada, who "...are presently
feeding about 180 head of our heifers which we intend to bring
to the states this year to use as we start our dairy operation
at Carrington." (This is quoted from their letter
addressed to the Foster County Livestock Planning and Zoning
Commission, dated January 24, 2008.) How do we know that
the Van Bedaf cows aren't related to the BSE-positive dairy cows
from their home region of Calmar? Another mad cow from
that area was discovered on the 12th of February...
having for a time slipped through their careful monitoring
systems. Our national and local beef raisers have
suffered enough from the taint of mad cow disease... reportedly
brought to us unintentionally from the UK and Canada. How
many Foster County residents will feel comfortable eating a
hamburger if they think it might possibly be from a processed
dairy cow from the Van Bedaf herd? One can feel empathy
for the Van Bedafs and the stigma that they must face with the
recent reoccurrence of mad cow disease from their area.
But, is it not a community's first duty to protect our local families, our
children, our local herds, and the health of our community
rather than take a chance on an unknown source from another country
that could potentially - even if unintentionally - cause harm?

12th case of mad cow in Canada
Feb 27, 2008 6:56 AM TVNZ News
Canada confirmed a new
case of mad cow disease on Tuesday, the 12th since 2003, and
said the animal in question was a six year old dairy cow from
Alberta which had not entered the human or animal food
supply.
The Canadian Food Inspection Agency, which vows to eradicate
bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) within a decade, has
consistently said it expects to find a few cases of the disease.
The cow was born after Canada and the United States introduced a
ban in 1997 on cattle feed that contained ingredients made from
rendered cattle and other ruminants. At least four other cases
involved animals born after 1997.
Canada has generally blamed contaminated feed for its cases of
mad cow disease.
Many trading partners shut their borders to Canadian cattle and
beef products after the first home-grown case in 2003, dealing a
massive blow to the industry, and Ottawa has fought hard to
restore market confidence.
More...
Centre to tackle mad cow cases
By BROOKES MERRITT, SUN MEDIA
The Edmonton Sun February 28,
2008
On Tuesday, the
Canadian Food Inspection Agency confirmed another case in a
six-year-old dairy cow from the Edmonton area. The animal
was born after a 1997 feed ban to prevent cows from eating food
contaminated with cow tissue, but scientists have long expected
a few cases will pop up from time to time. The prion centre's
Dr. David Westaway said the new case could have resulted from
contamination of an old feed container. "The other theory is
that sometimes these cases can have a genetic origin, where the
animals' DNA has mutated," he said.
More...
Infected Alberta
dairy cow latest case of mad cow disease in Canada
The Canadian Press - Feb 27, 2008
"We haven't planned
any action because of this case," Karen Eggert said in an
interview from Washington. "We expected more cases from Canada.
We took that into account in our risk assessment and still found
that the risk of establishing BSE here in this country is
negligible."
That didn't stop the U.S. rancher group R-CALF, which is
currently in court trying to stop the importation of older
cattle from Canada, from calling on the USDA to do something
about the latest positive test.
"It is a near certainty
that the U.S. will import BSE-infected cattle from Canada ...
and that these cattle will continue to incubate the disease
right here in the U.S.A.," R-CALF president Max Thornsberry said
in a news release.
"Our government is not even testing these high-risk Canadian
animals before they enter the U.S. food supply. I don't know how
much more irresponsible you can get than what USDA is now
doing."
More...
Canadian food inspection agency confirms new case of mad cow
disease
The Associated PressPublished: February 26, 2008
OTTAWA: Canada confirmed a new case of mad cow
disease on Tuesday, marking the country's 12th such case since
the disease was first discovered there in 2003. The Canadian
Food Inspection Agency said no part of the cow's carcass entered
the human food or animal feed chains.
The animal is a
six-year-old cow from Alberta, born after the implementation of
Canada's feed ban in 1997. The national monitoring program
targets cattle most at risk for the disease, which is also known
as bovine spongiform encephalopathy. The food inspections
agency said it expects to detect a small number of cases over
the next 10 years as Canada moves toward its goal of eliminating
the disease from its herds.
More...
Massive Beef Recall Follows Mad Cow Scare
USDA orders recall of 143 million pounds of frozen beef
By Mark Huffman - ConsumerAffairs.Com
February 17, 2008
The U.S. Department of Agriculture is recalling 143 million
pounds of frozen beef in the wake of a video showing so-called
downer cattle being prepared for slaughter at a California
plant. The recall includes beef products produced after February
1, 2006 at the Westland/Hallmark Meat Co. in Chino.
A consumer group said the recall was the result of a "terrible
failure" by the USDA and said consumers are losing confidence in
the safety of the American food supply.
...
Mad cow disease
The slaughter of downer cattle set off alarm bells among
investigators because not being able to walk is one of the
symptoms of bovine spongiform encephalopathy, otherwise known as
Mad Cow Disease.
There are strict rules that are supposed to keep meat from
infected cows out of cattle feed – much less the human food
supply. In addition, Schafer says the fact the cows weren't
inspected raises all sorts of other alarming possibilities,
including foodborne pathogens such as E. coli O157:H7 and
Salmonella.
More...
Supplements used in factory farming can spread disease
Seattle Times,
December, 2003
"So calves, male and female, are shunted away from many large
dairy farms — usually within two weeks of birth — to specialized
feedlots, where they are quickly weaned from milk and fed
protein supplement pellets, along with hay. These calves depend
on supplements for most of their protein intake until they are
about 3 months old, when they are mature enough to digest
cellulose and absorb protein on their own.
Bovine spongiform
encephalopathy, or BSE, the brain malady known as mad-cow
disease, can infect cattle that eat protein supplements made
from the remains of cattle and other ruminant livestock.
The disease is not transmitted by milk, which calves would
normally be getting from their mothers.
"Because of the supplement regime, dairy cattle are especially
susceptible to this problem," said Arthur Linton, a cattle
geneticist and director of Washington State University's
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced yesterday
that the Washington state dairy cow that tested positive this
month for mad-cow disease probably came to the United States
from the Canadian province of Alberta in August 2001."
Summary Report: Epidemiological Investigation of Washington
State BSE Case: March 2004
"On December 23, 2003, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
announced a presumptive positive case of BSE in a Holstein cow
slaughtered in the State of Washington. The infected cow entered
the United States on September 4, 2001, as part of a shipment of
81 animals from the source herd in Canada.
On January 6, 2003, Dr.
Ron DeHaven, USDA’s Chief Veterinary Officer, and Dr. Brian
Evans, Canada’s Chief Veterinary Officer, held a joint press
conference to announce that DNA evidence indicated—with a high
degree of certainty—that the BSE-positive cow found in
Washington State originated from a dairy farm in Calmar,
Alberta, Canada. The DNA evidence is based on comparative
testing of DNA from the brain of the positive cow with DNA from
semen of her sire and with blood from the heifer calf born from
the BSE-positive cow on the index farm. The test results were
independently confirmed by both U.S. and Canadian animal health
laboratories."
FINAL BSE UPDATE – Monday, February 9, 2004
"Investigation:
The epidemiological tracing
and DNA evidence proves that the BSE positive cow slaughtered in the
State of Washington on December 9, 2003, was born on a dairy farm in
Calmar, Alberta, Canada, on April 9, 1997. She was moved to the
United States in September 2001 along with 80 other cattle from that
dairy. A brain sample collected from the cow at slaughter tested
positive for BSE on December 23rd.
The Subcommittee recognized that the North American BSE situation
vividly demonstrates the unwarranted and very significant social and
financial impact when importing countries fail to comply with
science-based international rules regarding trade. The subcommittee
hopes that the United States will continue to demonstrate leadership
in trade matters by adopting import/export policy in accordance with
the science and international standards."
Comprehensive BSE Investigation
"As part of a cooperative
investigation by Canadian and U.S. officials, DNA testing determined
that the
animal originated from a herd in Alberta, Canada. This second
case of BSE native to North America, is
confirmed to have occurred in a cow before the ban on feeding cattle
meat and bone meal (MBM) from
ruminants, which was implemented by Canada and the United States in
1997. On May 20th, 2003
Canada reported the first native case of BSE, which had also been
born before the ban. A comprehensive
investigation concluded that the original source of the BSE prion in
MBM is likely to have come from a
limited number of cattle imported directly into either Canada or the
U.S. from the U.K. in the 1980s, before BSE was detected in that
country. It is likely that some of these animals were slaughtered or
died and entered the animal feed system prior to a ban on further
importations from the U.K. in 1990.2
A Harmonized BSE Prevention and Control
System
The events which ultimately led to the introduction of BSE in North
America most probably occurred more than a decade ago with the
importation of a small number of animals from the U.K. Since that
time, extensive safeguards to control and eliminate BSE have been
implemented in both countries and continue to be enhanced in
accordance with the best available science. The finding of a small
number of cases in North America has been predicted by international
experts and the Harvard BSE Risk Assessment."
Pathogens and Contaminants [from the USDA National Agricultural
Library Web Site]
A Focus on Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy
"Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), commonly known as "mad cow
disease", is a fatal neurodegenerative disease in cattle that causes
a spongy degeneration in the brain and spinal cord. BSE has a long
incubation period, about 4 years, usually affecting adult cattle at
a peak age onset of four to five years, all breeds being equally
susceptible. Post-mortem pathological tests of the brain tissue are
the only existing methods to confirm BSE.
Mad cow disease is believed to be linked to the variant
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), a fatal transmissible spongiform
encephalopathy (TSE) disease found in humans. The relationship of
the infective BSE agent and vCJD in humans is not completely
understood and no direct correlation has been confirmed; however, a
strong association exists between humans infected with vCJD and
exposure to BSE-infected products. Understanding the TSE agent’s
ability to cross species barriers and developing more sensitive
antemortem diagnostic tests are two current areas of research."
Ranchers Shouldn`t Worry About Canadian Mad Cow
2/27/2008 KQCD News Story - Dickinson, ND
Agriculture leaders say North Dakota ranchers don`t have to worry
about the newly confirmed case of mad cow disease in Canada.
It`s the second case there in the past two months.
Agriculture commissioner Roger Johnson says he doesn`t think the
newest case is a health issue for animals here, but says it will
probably cause some marketing problems.
He says because the US accepts imports of cattle from Canada that
meet certain requirements, other countries say the US has a lower
standard.
Johnson says it`s a problem that he and others warned against when
the agreement was made between the US and Canada, and it isn`t
likely to change.
He says he`s concerned that new cases are being discovered in
animals that were born after a ban on contaminated feed was supposed
to have eliminated the source.
"This latest one, again,
six-year-old Holstein cow, that`s three years, born three years
after the ban was supposed to have been effective and the
contaminated feed was supposed to be out of the system," Johnson
says. "Well clearly it was not, there`s still quite clearly some
contaminated feed that`s re-circulating up there."
Johnson says the risk of a contaminated cow entering North Dakota is
very small.
INDEPTH: MAD
COW
Mad Cow in Canada: The science and the story
CBC News Online | August 24, 2006
In August 2006, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, the federal
regulator responsible for monitoring the safety of Canadian cattle,
confirmed a case of mad cow disease in an older cow in Alberta. It
was the fifth case in 2006 and the eighth since 2003.
The agency said locating the cow shows the success of its monitoring
program.
Brad Wildeman, vice-president of the Canadian Cattlemen's
Association, took the same line.
More infected animals have been found because of the extent of the
testing, he said.
"We probably have the most aggressive, safest beef supply of any
country in the world."
For years, Canada had been virtually free of mad cow disease. But in
May 2003, veterinary officials in Alberta confirmed that a sick cow
sent to a slaughterhouse in January of that year had been inspected,
found to be substandard, and removed so that it would not end up as
food for humans or other animals.
The carcass was, however, sent to a processing plant for rendering
into oils. Its head was kept for testing. Samples were sent to the
world testing laboratories in the U.K., which confirmed the case of
mad cow.
More...
Agriculture Department resists banning all 'downer' cattle
WASHINGTON - Slaughterhouse Abuse
Feb 28, 2008 5:46 PM By ERICA WERNER, AP
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The agriculture secretary on Thursday
resisted calls from Democratic senators for a complete ban on
so-called downer cattle - those unable to walk - from entering the
food supply.
In the wake of the largest beef recall in U.S. history, Agriculture
Secretary Edward T. Schafer announced new steps to ensure the safety
of the country's meat supply, including more random inspections of
slaughterhouses and immediate audits of the 23 plants that supply
meat for federal programs, primarily school lunches.
But Schafer contended downer cattle could occasionally enter the
food supply safely, in accordance with USDA rules, after an
additional inspection by a veterinarian.
More...
|
CALL COMMISSIONERS TO PROTEST
THE MEGA-DAIRY!
Foster County Commissioners
Chairperson:
Dwayne Erickson
180 90th Avenue SE
Kensal, ND 58455
Ph #: 701-435-2388
Cell #: 701-653-5202
Vice-Chairperson
James E Carr
6825 2nd Street NE
Carrington, ND 58421
Ph #: 701-652-3316
Cell #: 701-650-1383
Member
LeRoy Hart
7975 3rd Street SE
Carrington, ND 58421
Ph #: 701-285-3310
|
Click here to print out a copy of the petition.
|

AS-1155
Scott Birchall, Livestock Waste Management Specialist
"One of the most important
decisions when planning any livestock facility is site selection.
The site for the feedlot operation must not only be suitable for
housing, handling and feeding cattle, but also must ensure that
surface and ground waters are protected and that the impact from
odors is minimized. Whether you are planning a new facility or
modifying an existing one, the following checklist may help avoid
costly mistakes....
Odor
Minimizing the impact of odor on neighboring residents is a
combination of:
~Recognizing the prevailing wind direction. In North Dakota, this is
usually from the north west or south east (or north/south in the Red
River Valley).
~Using topography to your advantage. Odor tends to "drain" down
slope in the evening in summer.
~Reduce visual impact. Visual confirmation of dust is more likely to
result in odor complaints. Windbreaks will also help break up odor
plumes and provide stock protection.
~Providing a buffer distance to the neighbors. It is difficult to
specify a particular buffer distance without taking into account the
previous factors. Be aware that odors from some larger facilities
have been detected 4 to 5 miles distant. Anyone planning a facility
within 1 to 2 miles of neighboring dwellings will have to provide
more detailed information on how they plan to minimize odor."
Read More...
(The above web site
-produced by the North
Dakota State University
NDSU Extension Service-
is
extremely informative about the precautions that should be taken
regarding livestock waste management. How does the proposed
MEGA-dairy intend to address these
concerns?) |